Reusable Statements in Dialog-Based Argumentation Systems

نویسندگان

  • Alexander Schneider
  • Christian Meter
چکیده

Discussions on the Internet are usually conducted in isolation on a single platform, although there are many discussions on the same topic going on simultaneously all over the Internet. We argue that it is possible to connect similar discussions by reusing arguments, thus gaining a connected network of statements, supports and counterarguments which helps eradicate redundant and repetitive parts of common discussions. To achieve this goal we outline challenges that need to be solved and propose a possible architecture to tackle those challenges.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Dialog-Based Online Argumentation: Findings from a Field Experiment

In this paper we report on the results of a field experiment where more than 300 participants used dialog-based online argumentation. The participants were computer science students discussing how to improve the computer science course of studies. At the beginning of the argumentation the participants were informed that the results would be carefully considered by the computer science departmen...

متن کامل

DiaLaw: Levels, Dialog Trees, Convincing Arguments

DiaLaw is a dialogical model of legal justification. An important characteristic of the formal and implemented model DiaLaw is that both logic-based arguments and mere convincing statements can be modelled. The support of both structural (logic-based) arguments and procedural arguments (mere convincing statements) is expressed by different levels in the dialog. In this paper so-called dialog tr...

متن کامل

Persuasive Argumentation in a Medical Diagnosis Tutoring System

An important problem in intelligent tutoring systems and decision support systems in general concern the implementation of a convincing argumentation dialog between the system and the student or the user. The requirements for a convincing argumentation dialog can vary depending on the kinds of conflicts that arise in the exchanges between the system and the user. In this paper we discuss an app...

متن کامل

Testing the benfits of structured argumentation in multi-agent deliberation dialogues

Work on argumentation-based dialogue systems often assumes that the adoption of argumentation leads to improved efficiency and effectiveness. Several studies have taken an experimental approach to prove these alleged benefits, but none has so far supported the expressiveness of a logic for structured argumentation. This paper shows how the use of argumentation in deliberation dialogues can be t...

متن کامل

Agent dialogues and argumentation

Agents have different interests and desires. Agents also hold different beliefs and assumptions. To accomplish tasks jointly, agents need to better convey information between each other and facilitate fair negotiations. In this thesis, we investigate agent dialogue systems developed with the Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) framework. In our system, agents represent their beliefs and desire...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017